Today, terrorism and homeland security have become the new filter that many decisions must pass through. What if someone attacks key nodes of the energy grid? How much would that cost to recover and rebuild the system? What would be the impact on the whole economy? Students of Amory Lovins will recall his book "Brittle Power: Energy Strategy for National Security" which raised the same questions two decades ago.

The attached article from Whit Allen makes the case for expanding Distributed Generation (DG) as an answer to energy security and potential terrorism. DG provides power from smaller, self-contained units like micro turbines and fuel cells, and thus, less likely to be a target.

The independent option seems to challenge the whole notion of an interconnected society. The internet's growth around the world has been a function of expanded linkages of fibre optic and cable. Power systems, communication networks, roads and bridges knit our society together, both domestically and internationally. Yet, being self reliant for your energy needs has an appeal for critical industries and government functions.

I offer this report to give you the opportunity to examine the concept of independence vs. inter-dependence in the energy world. Would it make sense for your company, office building, or home to disconnect from the current electrical grid that supplies your electricity? That's doable today if you desire. The GENI Initiative sees the grid as a vehicle for increased regional, national and international trade, fostering cooperation and peace between nations. The reality of terrorism must be addressed, but must we radically alter our society to protect ourselves?

Please vote with your dollars by investing in the sustainability of our planet.