
Utility executives see future profits in transmission
Jan 14, 2004 - Greenwire Faced with intense
pressure to make power delivery more reliable in the
wake of the August 2003 blackout, the electric utility
industry is set to pour major money into transmission,
according to a survey of top industry officials released
yesterday.
After spending decades on the industry's
backburner, the power grid is expected to emerge as
the sector that will gain the most investment over
the next five years, according to the energy consulting
firm GF Energy's "2004 Electricity Outlook."
GF Energy's findings are based on telephone surveys
administered to 72 U.S. and Canadian industry officials
between Oct. 22, 2003, and Nov. 13, 2003. Seventy-five
percent of the respondents were in senior management,
and 56 percent responded to the survey.
Most of the U.S. executives who participated in the
survey said transmission is the area where utilities
can profit the most, assuming the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission follows through on a proposal to boost
a utility's return on equity to 15 percent when it
participates in a regional transmission organization
(RTO) or makes other investments in the grid.
"Transmission is where the most money can be made,
the most profitable business to be in," said Roger
Gale, president and chief executive officer of GF
Energy.
In the last decade or so, competition in wholesale
electricity markets and an increased demand for power
has expanded the use of the grid. As a result, a majority
of utility officials said reliability has decreased.
Gale called the link between competition and declining
reliability a "smoking gun," and said it is putting
more pressure than ever on utilities to establish
tougher reliability standards.
Last week, directors of the utility industry's main
lobbying arm, the Edison Electric Institute, approved
a resolution calling on the industry-based North American
Electric Reliability Council (NERC) to form new reliability
standards, with FERC "supporting and providing oversight
to the NERC initiatives."
NERC sets reliability operations standards industry-wide.
By contrast, FERC historically has not involved itself
in reliability issues because it was not granted explicit
authority over reliability under the Federal Power
Act.
But after last year's blackout and the failed passage
of the energy bill, which includes language expanding
federal authority over reliability standards, FERC
is exploring ways to extend its regulatory reach without
congressional action (Greenwire, Jan. 12).
"The battle is now under way to see if FERC or NERC
manages reliability in the United States and Canada,"
Gale said.
The survey also found that industry leaders think
FERC's standard market design (SMD) is dead, at least
for the next four years. FERC's plan would have grouped
power markets into RTOs, a proposal rejected by utilities
and lawmakers from the Pacific Northwest and the South.
The energy bill, rejected by the Senate in November
but expected to be back again later this month, expressly
forbids FERC from ordering utilities to join RTOs.
The bill also delays implementation of FERC's SMD
policies for at least three years (Greenwire, Jan.
12).
"FERC has been stopped in their tracks, for better
or for worse," Gale said.
Most executives who were surveyed also said the old-fashioned,
vertically integrated business model is now the most
viable strategy for utilities. Sixty percent of those
surveyed said they believe that large integrated utilities
will own much of the next generation of power facilities.
Industry leaders also expressed concern over high
natural gas prices and compliance with the Clean Air
Act.
|