Quantcast

IEA Says $10 Trillion Needed for Clean Technology

Posted: October 6, 2009

MICHAEL CASEY,
AP Environmental Writer

BANGKOK—The International Energy Agency said Tuesday that a $10 trillion investment in renewable energy, biofuels and nuclear power over the next 20 years is necessary in order to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions.

Click here to find out more!

The Paris-based agency, which serves as a policy adviser on energy issues to 28 industrialized countries, warned that if governments failed to commit to an investment capable of remaking the energy sector, greenhouse gas emissions would more than double above safe levels in the "longer term." The energy sector—which includes the oil, gas and coal used to power industry and fuel vehicles—represents 85 percent of all global carbon dioxide emissions.

But the organization said if the money were poured into the right technology, leaders would succeed in preventing temperatures from rising 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial levels—the threshold at which most scientists say serious climate change will ensue.

The IEA recommends that most of the spending until 2020 go into increasing energy efficiency, renewable energy and biofuels. In the following decade, more should be directed into nuclear power and the largely untested scheme of capturing carbon dioxide produced from burning coal and storing it underground, known as carbon capture and sequestration.

The IEA plan calls for 33 percent of energy to come from renewables, including nuclear power, by 2030—about triple today's 18 percent. That would mean constructing 18 nuclear reactors and 17,000 windmills ever year. About 60 percent of vehicles worldwide would have to be either hybrid or electric.

"The message is simple and stark: If the world continues on the basis of today's energy and climate policies, the consequences of climate change will be severe," said IEA Executive Director Nobuo Tanaka, noting that under the agency's plan, fossil fuel usage would peak by 2020 and emissions would be capped at 6 percent above 2007 levels.

"Energy is at the heart of the problem—and so must form the core of the solution," he said.

The report was presented on the sidelines of the U.N. climate talks where negotiators are working feverishly to craft a new climate pact that would replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. World leaders are hoping to forge a new deal in December in Copenhagen.

But negotiators from industrialized countries have yet to commit to any budget to finance clean technology and the other measures needed to move to a low-carbon economy. They also haven't agreed to the deep emissions cuts that the IEA plan endorses.

The agency said three-quarters of its plan should be financed by industrialized countries and more than 40 percent of the money would be spent in poor countries, mostly in world's top emitter, China, which IEA estimates could account for about a third of global emission reductions by 2020.

The plan would require, among other things, "a major revolution on the car manufactures side, a big task," IEA Chief Economist Fatih Biroh said. "They will change their business plans if they get a signal from Copenhagen. They will not change themselves."

Most delegates and environmentalists Tuesday welcomed the IEA report as a reminder that negotiators need to put aside their differences and come to an agreement on the core issues.

"The IEA clearly states that the world needs a binding international climate agreement. The longer we postpone action, the more expensive it will be," Danish Climate and Energy Minister Connie Hedegaard said in a statement. "That is why the world needs to act now."

You want solutions?

Right, so now we mix black and white to get pink? Finally you said yes to renewables, but you have to mention Nuclear, so you can have profits? Are you still trying to make people ignore all the problems we have with nuclear waste?that there's no solution for all that radiation excepting sit down and pray?.. Biofuels?? Do you mean to keep throwing out native people from their land to grow food to feed cars? Yeh, sure.. Cause the world doesn't have problems with wasted land, isn't? cause the World Resources Institute haven't given enough statistics about agricultural problems, right? and pointing out that if we're going to use land should be for FOOD only -means food for PEOPLE, got it?

What about consumption reduction? But I'm sure you will never talk about that, cause it's not a business, is it?

People of the world, wake up. It's time to change OUR lifestyle.. or driving our children to hell.

[report comment]

Saria @ Oct 07, 2009 07:26:15 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Quantcast

National Science Foundation

NSF

Can Math and Science Help Solve Crimes?

Researchers try to predict and prevent crime using sophisticated mathematical models.

Adhesive Bond Strong Enough to Hold a Human

A new rapid adhesion mechanism could produce shoes or gloves that stick and un-stick to walls.

How Fear Works In the Brain

Scientists are zeroing in on the brain chemicals responsible for the development of emotional trauma.

advertisement

Quantcast

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!

Click here to find out more!