Solar power on tribal lands: Part
1
Jan 26, 2011 - Ryan D. Dreveskracht - Planet
Profit Report
Last month, the Quechan Tribe obtained an injunction
that shut down a 709-megawatt solar farm planned
for more than 6,000 acres of public land in the desert
near El Centro, California. The project would have
been one of the nation's largest solar facilities.
A number of factors have hindered the proliferation
of solar projects on public lands. By far the largest
hurdle, exemplified by the Quechan suit, is the permitting
process. Indeed, a recent study found that in 2009
alone, traditional energy companies had received
1,927 leases for nearly 28 million acres of federally
managed land, while solar companies had received
none.
Because public lands fall under the jurisdiction
of land stewards such as the Bureau of Land Management,
a federal review under the National Environmental
Policy Act, the National Historic Preservation Act
and other federal laws is required. Obtaining permits
that comply with these laws can take years and cost
millions. Further, once the permits are granted,
there will surely be litigation as to the propriety
of the permitting process. As a result of these permitting
setbacks, many solar companies that started in the
supposed solar-boom of 2005 have gone bankrupt.
“Not in my backyard (NIMBY)” and collective
action problems also loom large on public lands,
despite support from the public and the environmental
community. When it comes to specific siting, it seems,
opposition to solar projects is universal. As recently
reported by Newsweek, for solar developers “NIMBY” has
been replace by BANANA: build absolutely nothing
anywhere near anyone. As California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
said, “They say that we want renewable energy,
but we don‘t want you to put it anywhere. I
mean, if we cannot put solar power plants in the
Mojave Desert, I don‘t know where the hell
we can put them.”
Solar Projects in Indian Country
In Allen v. Gold Country Casino, the court noted
that where a tribe owns and operates an economic
development project, “there is no question
that . . . economic and other advantages inure to
the benefit of the Tribe.” This is true – relatively
speaking. Tribes, as sovereign nations, are necessarily
and by definition not restrained by the same mechanisms
as are federal and state governments.
In other words, tribes have advantages, like China
has advantages, when compared with the U.S. – the
defining factor being that sovereign nations are
able to enact their own laws and be ruled by them.
Thus, neither states nor the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission can block solar projects on Indian lands.
Where the energy goes is of no consequence either,
since no “federal action” is required
in the sale. Although “federal action” is
required where a project affects a federal trust
resource (i.e. land, water, etc.), the 2005 Energy
Policy Act granted the Department of Energy the power
to “authorize individual Indians and tribal
governments to enter into energy development leases
or business agreements without Federal review . .
. .”
Further, unlike public lands, where there the “BANANA” mantra
resonates, many tribes have shown a very active interest
in solar projects. For example: the Jemez Pueblo
are building the Nation’s first utility-scale
solar plant on tribal land; the Pyramid Lake Paiute
have installed numerous photovoltaic panels on their
reservation; the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians
are running a 1.1-megawatt photovoltaic renewable
energy system on its reservation; and a Navajo company
called Sacred Power will provide solar power systems
to Navajo Nation homes without access to electricity.
Finally, although by no means exhaustive, a laundry
list of economic incentives unique to investment
in Indian Country is at least warranted: New Market
Tax Credits; Utility Net-Metering Rebates; Investor
Tax Credits; Renewable Energy Certificates/Green
Tags; Employment Tax Credits; Accelerated Depreciation;
Tax-Exempt Financing; Clean Renewable Energy Bonds;
USDA – Rural Energy for America Program (REAP)
Grants; Economic Stimulus Bonds; Discounted Leasing
Rates; Federal Contracting Preferences; and Customs
Duty Deferrals.
With solar electricity forecasts on tribal lands
estimated to be 4.5 times the yearly total electricity
needs of the U.S., Indian Country presents a very
viable option for solar projects. If the tribal solar
projects mentioned above are any indication, some
tribes and energy companies have been catching on.
In Part 2 of this series I will explain why this
is a good thing for tribes seeking sustainable economic
development projects.
|