
Creating a 21st Century Grid
Nov 9, 2007 - Stephen Lacey - RenewableEnergyAccess.com
 |
|
Photo Credit:
myrick.house.gov
|
Peterborough, New Hampshire - In 1957, as Eisenhower
began his second term as U.S. President, the first
satellite launched into orbit and the first commercial
nuclear reactor came online, electrical workers all
over the country were installing the world's most
advanced transmission and distribution (T&D) system.
Today, much of that T&D system installed 50 years
ago remains in place, holding together a patchwork
grid for ever-expanding electricity markets.
Now in 2007 – the age of the internet, personal digital
media and distributed energy — the grid has failed
to keep pace with the rapidly changing technological
landscape. While most industries rely on technologies
that have been invented or updated in the last few
years, the electricity delivery industry uses technologies
that have more or less stayed the same for 100 years.
|
"You have to think much more distributed than
centralized, you have to solve the problem of
storing energy, and it has to be much more like
an internet system than the current grid is
today in order to be effective."
Dr. Wade Adams, Director, Richard E. Smalley
Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology
|
There's a common idiom that goes, “if it ain't broke
don't fix it.” While the grid in the U.S. is hardly
broken, it is beginning to deteriorate rapidly in
some places, and it will need some serious repairs
in order to meet the growing demand for electricity
in general and distributed renewable electricity specifically.
“We need to see a very substantial transformation
of the system,” says David Meyer, Senior Policy Advisor
in the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). “We're outgrowing
it in many parts of the nation. It's certainly not
the high-capacity, integrated and smart system that
we need.”
The current grid is a stiff arrangement of one-way
transmission lines, centralized generation facilities
and aging substations. The recent emergence of large
amounts of renewable electricity in markets around
the country are creating new challenges for both the
transmission and distribution sectors.
On the transmission side, the issue is whether there
are enough lines to bring renewable energy onto the
grid. Because many of the abundant renewable resources
are far away from load centers, additional lines must
be built to bring wind, solar and geothermal energies
to market. If plans to construct lines are not on
the table, developers will be hesitant to build large
projects in these rural areas.
“This is what we call the 'chicken and egg' problem,”
says Meyer. “It's difficult to develop new generation
without being certain that the transmission capacity
is there or will be there. No one wants to be out
front taking an undue portion of the risk.”
As planners look to build more of those lines, they
may have some emerging technologies to consider; particularly
High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) and wires based
on nanotechnology.
HVDC transmission is certainly not a new concept
— but it's gaining ground in the U.S. as renewable
electricity will have to be transported further distances
with higher efficiency in the future.
The other technology still in the research and development
phase is the “armchair quantum wire,” made from tubes
of carbon 100,000 times thinner than a human hair,
called carbon nanotubes. When these nanotubes are
made into a larger wire, they can conduct electricity
far more efficiently and over far greater distances
than the copper wires used today. 'A leading researcher
of carbon nanotubes, Dr. Wade Adams of the Richard
E. Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology,
says that these nanotube wires can theoretically conduct
100 million amps of current over thousands of miles
without much loss in efficiency. Today's wires conduct
around 2,000 amps of current over hundreds of miles,
with about 6 to 8% of the electricity lost in the
form of heat. 'According to Adams, these armchair
quantum wires will also be one sixth the weight of
current wires and so strong that they won't need support
mechanisms. That means new transmission lines would
be less conspicuous, and perhaps not as controversial
to communities and interest groups concerned about
their impact on the landscape.
"That enables us to carry, say, electrical
power from vast solar farms in the desert to the Northeast,
or maybe from wind farms in Montana or North Dakota
down to Florida – and in fact, even from continent
to continent," says Adams.
Of course, transmission lines made from carbon nanotubes
are about 10-15 years away from commercialization.
But if brought to scale, these new lines could transform
how the nation, and indeed the world, transmits large
amounts of renewable electricity.
The distribution sector, which is made up of facilities
that lower voltage for ordinary consumption, faces
a different set of issues. One of the biggest challenges
for distribution is the emergence of smaller renewable
energy generators, which can sometimes cause issues
with metering and load flow. This is where the “smart”
grid system comes in.
In order to better control electricity entering the
grid at the local level, interactive control devices,
monitoring networks, energy storage facilities and
demand response systems will need to be implemented.
As distributed generation becomes more widespread
and local communities start generating their own power,
the grid must adapt in order to handle a steady two-way
flow of electricity.
“You have to think much more distributed than centralized,
you have to solve the problem of storing energy, and
it has to be much more like an internet system than
the current grid is today in order to be effective,”
says Adams.
These upgrades of the T&D infrastructure won't be
cheap and they won't happen quickly. According to
the Electric Power Research Institute, a California-based
energy think tank, the cost of upgrading the grid
with “smart” technologies could be $100 billion. Some
analysts have put the figure at around $150 billion.
While utilities and other developers would pay for
much of the upgrade, ratepayers and taxpayers would
also be responsible for the bill.
However, the economic impact associated with a failed
grid could rival the price of an upgrade. For example,
the 2003 Northeast blackout caused an estimated $6
billion in direct and indirect economic losses over
only a few days.
According to the North American Reliability Corporation's
2007 Long-term Reliability Assessment of the North
American Grid released last month, transmission capacity
continues to lag behind demand and will need to increase
by more than 10% over the next 10 years to meet the
needs of the U.S. electricity markets, especially
as more states integrate renewables into their energy
portfolios. The report also recognizes the imminent
need to develop reliable storage capacity to better
manage demand.
So in 2007, as we use the grid in ways it was not
originally designed for, the energy community is looking
for new ways to maintain the T&D infrastructure so
that it doesn't just meet market needs, but reacts
to them.
“There's a lot of awareness of the benefits associated
with this kind of change. While we won't see the change
overnight, I am very optimistic that we can implement
these new technologies and make the grid far more
sophisticated,” says DOE's Meyer.
|