
FALL-WINTER-1991
Dear GENI Friend;
Our recent International Workshop in
Winnipeg, Canada provided strong corroboration
by the 36 specialists from around the world.
Enclosed is the consensus Executive Summary
that clearly states that connecting international
and inter-regional electric energy networks
is better for the economy, better for the environment,
better for developing nations and better for
mutual stability and security.
 |
|
Video results of the International Workshop
are now available - including interviews
with 10 specialists (excerpts are highlighted
in this newsletter). Click on the video
to order now!
|
With this information in hand, we delivered
these findings in September to the United Nations
Environment Program, the Center for Research
and Technology Development and International
Economic Cooperation. In 1971 the Office for
Development and International Economic Cooperation.
In 1971 the Natural Resources Division had proposed
North/South interconnections to reduce fossil
fuel use in developed countries by tapping abundant
hydropower in Africa and Latin America. This
is both feasible and desirable today.
The UN
Environmental Program has offered to co-sponsor
a broader discussion of GENI more delegates,
media attention and a specific focus on India,
China and Southeast Asia. With over 50% of the
world,s population, their sustainable development
is critical for us all. It was recommended that
countries could now champion this initiative
at the Earth Summit in Brazil
next year.
Two very important artifacts came from
the International Workshop. This first is the
Executive Summary which you can read on the
following pages. The other is the video documentary
A WIN-WIN SOLUTION which
is a discussion by several of the specialists.
This film should be in corporate boardrooms,
developing nations, service clubs and cable
programs around the world.
We need your help to accomplish this.
Purchase this new video or contribute funds
to further this research on all continents and
educate people around the world to these findings.
(We have already been invited to present our
results and an International
Meeting on the World Energy System: Technical
Possibilities and Benefits in St. Petersburg,
USSR
later this year.) If we do what the
experts suggest, it will change the world.
In cooperation,
Peter Meisen
Executive Director
|
GENI DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:
Will Gannett, Robert Kiyosaki, Wyn Knapp, Peter
Meisen, David Steven, Kim Watkins
GENI ADVISORS:
Raghbir Basi, Brian Bieler, Milton Byrd, David
Cline, Mark Victor Hansen, Terry Lipman, Karen
Morgan, Robert Muller, Glenn Olds, Malcolm Roberts,
Marshall Thurber
Newsletter produced
by ARTLAB TWO THOUSAND INC., Toronto, Ontario,
Canada
|
Executive summary
Introduction
Recent
advances in high voltage transmission
and automated distribution technologies make it feasi-
ble for many power entities to optimize the production
and supply
of electric energy. The transfer of power from
one agency to another
across its own or adjoining networks is increasing
dramatically with con-
siderable economic and environmental benefits.
In view of these experiences
a study by the Committee on Natural Resources of the
UN Economic and
Social Council concluded that intra and even intercontinental
power grids
may be a realistic method of alleviating some of the
world present pollu-
tion problems and power supply shortages. Economic
utilization of
the enormous hydropower potential of Latin America,
Africa and
Asia to assist in Third World growth and development
can be
attractive features of international grids.
This work-
shop was therefore organized to address
these issues.
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP
|
On the limits of long-
distance high-voltage
power transmission and
the
corresponding economic,
environmental, and socio-
political implications.
|
Held in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
July 10 - 13, 1991
|
OBJECTIVES
The objective of the Workshop was to appraise the
technical, economic, environmental and sociopolitical
feasibility of international electrical interchange
and its implementation potential on a global basis.
There have been numerous meetings, studies and reports
on specific aspects of this issue by technical societies,
research institutions and industry sponsored activities.
To our knowledge, this Workshop is the first to assemble
a group of individuals with diverse backgrounds and
geographical origins including professionals and concerned
citizens to discuss this issue.
METHODOLOGY
To accomplish this objective, a group of 36 distinguished
international multi-disciplined and non-ideological
experts were gathered.*
[*The Group included businessmen, economists,
cabinet ministers, a former Governor General, officials
from the United Nations and the World Bank, academicians,
utility executives, environmentalists, and power systems
experts. The countries and regions represented include
the USA, USSR, Canada, Europe, Latin American, Asia,
Africa, the Middle East, Australia and New Zealand.]
The Group was divided into five study committees
dealing with the major aspects of this complex problem;
these were: Technical, Social/Political, Environmental,
Economic, and Implementation. The Committees deliberated
for two days separately and then discussed their findings
in daily plenary sessions. This provided a Continuing
dialogue throughout the Workshop.
PERTINENT INFORMATION
Energy is one of the most important factors in development
of the world.
Electrical energy represents over one third of energy
use and is growing at a very rapid rate (approximately
sevenfold since 1950). It is essential for economic
growth, and electric energy use correlates with improved
standard of living and quality of life.
The industrialized world (25% of world population)
consumes 75-80% of the total electric energy production.
Interconnections have helped to optimize the production
and distribution of energy and diminish the impact
on natural resources.
Environmental risks due to shortages of energy, particularly
electric energy, are significant and can be as high
or higher than those associated with the least desirable
forms of generation. Example: 80% of Africa,s energy
for heating and cooking is met by firewood, resulting
in deforestation, desertification and topsoil erosion.
Many untapped renewable resources (especially hydropower)
can be developed with minimum environmental costs
and greater benefit to developing nations. 34% of
untapped resources are in East Asia, 21% in Central
Africa and 18% in Latin America.
Advances in hardware technology, large scale system
theory, control, monitoring, and computing systems
can help optimize the production, transmission, distribution,
pricing, trading and billing.
The concept of regional grids has been proven advantageous
and is being expanded whenever politically and economically
feasible. An example is the discussion to connect
West and East Europe, linking the UCPTE
network and the COMECON
system.
Eventual realization of a global grid requires a
balance between transmission losses and cost of regional
power generation development. These costs can be evaluated
on a project by project basis.
Transmissions losses can be significantly minimized
in the future with new technologies which are spin-offs
of military and aerospace developments.
 |
International
Workshop
Delegation
July 10-13, 1991
Winnipeg,
Manitoba,
Canada
|
|
Front Row (left to right): Peter
Meisen, Dennis Woodford, , , Len
Bateman, Peter Dunne, Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah,
Don McGillis
Middle Row (left to right): Vladimir
Kozlov, , Bill Perk, Lev Belyaev, Muriel
Smith, Ludmila Ilyina, Joe Falcom, Alexis Rivero,
, Nikolai Voropai
Back Row (left to right): Jim
Service, Victor Yershevich, , Hans Stakegard,
Nelson Defranco, Jacque Lemay, Lars Weimer,
Walt Venable, ,,,, Segei
Roginko, Bob Bulmer
|
|
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
JACQUES
LEMAY
|
In Central America,
where you have a substantial amount of
hydro electricity available there, and
if you had a multi-terminal system traveling
through these countries with a certain
number of taps connected to that line,
then the great advantage of such technology
is that you can use the tap as a source
for a DC line. So you can connect the
local hydrogeneration from that country
to the DC line and go and sell that electricity
to another country which can pay for it.
Therefore, generation revenue for the
Latin American country.
*Quote
from the "WIN-WIN SOLUTION" Video.
|
|
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
- HVDC is the preferred type of transmission if
the distance involved is more than 1000 kilometers.
- For smaller distance, AC transmission is probably
more attractive. The economic voltage for AC depends
on the amount of power to be transmitted.
- AC voltages up to 1200 kV and DC voltages up to
+750 kV are technically realizable today.
Higher values are for tomorrow.
- Limitation on voltage levels may impose some restriction
on the practical length that can be considered from
an economic point of view. In any case, power transmission
per circuit mist be limited to that amount which
the receiving system can afford to lose. This is
the bottom line.
- Interconnections should form part of the general
reinforcement of the AC
systems so as to take full advantage of the interconnection.
- The voltage level of a DC interconnection should
be as high as practical since it has generally been
found that a higher voltage will pay for itself.
- When developing an interconnection, every effort
should be made to keep the design as simple as possible.
- Whenever possible, one should try to minimize
the number of DC
taps and maximize the use of the right-of-way involved
in any interconnection project.
- It has been noted that staging has an important
influence on the cost of a project and this connection,
DC transmission more easily lends itself to profit
from this feature.
- Finally, interconnections, especially those involving
more than one country, require a mechanisms for
the general agreement on planning, design, installation
and especially the operation of the interconnected
systems.
NELSON
DEFRANCO
Distances of 7000
kilometers, would be feasible. Not only
that physically it was feasible, but that
economically it was very competitive with
local generation that you could have in
Europe.
*Quote
from the "WIN-WIN SOLUTION" Video.
|
|
ECONOMICS WORKING GROUP
The economics of electrical supply have been overwhelmingly
in favor of continuing with the development of this
form of energy transfer. The present standard of living
of the developed countries does demonstrate this and
suggests the developing countries should be targeted
for an improved level of electrical supply. Interconnections
will plan an important role in this task. We found:
- The economic benefits have always exceeded the
anticipated or assumed values that justified the
interconnection in the firs place. Examples Include:
Nordel System connecting Scandinavia to Europe,
The British Channel underwater link connecting France
and England, multiple connections along the US/Canadian
border, the USSR system of 9 regional grid systems
connecting 7 time zones over 10,000 kilometers.
And the recent linking of East and West German took
just two months after the Berlin Wall came down
because of the substantial economic benefit to both.
- With all the experience represented in the working
group, a most significant finding was that not one
example was found of an unsuccessful interconnection.
- The system must be reliable, and interconnections
help to achieve a greater degree of reliability
in the system.
- Huge economic benefits are derived from the availability
of electricity:
- increased reliability, reduction of outages
- the conservation of capital
- better utilization of energy resources
- taking advantage of seasonal (north/south)
and time zone (east/west) diversity
- reduction of spinning reserve and other reserve
requirements of the system
- assist in the development of new generation
resources
- Money from military budgets could be channeled
into creating interconnections.
- The evolution of highly developed electrical grids
in the industrialized world suggest that a global
grid is feasible.
- If the total environmental costs of the thermal
station,s air pollution and unknown costs of decommissioning
nuclear stations were taken into account, the interconnection
of remote renewable energy sources would be significantly
more economically viable.
AHMEDOU
OULD-ABDALLAH
The difficulties
and risks could be balanced by the positive
aspects of a project. And these are: stability
and distribution of wealth through the
success of a project. It will help community
stability. It will help stabilize or reduce
population growth which is a major issue
on the environment and resources.
*Quote
from the WIN-WIN SOLUTION
Video.
|
|
SOCIOPOLITICAL WORKING GROUP
Assuming the Global Energy Network Project is technically
and economically feasible, the group:
- Agrees that the project might positively affect
the world,s sociopolitical and cultural development.
Interconnections will enhance the stability and
security between nations.
- Supports the Global Energy Network Project. International
interconnections exist today throughout the world,
and is not a technology that must wait for future
development.
- Recommends its implementation by phases. First
between countries of comparable economic development
in both the industrialized and developing world.
Eventually, world energy can be distributed more
equitable.
- Emphasized that any proposal for the extension
of international grids between sites, in particular,
those of different economic development, need to
proceed with great care to ensure each country,s
national interests and resources are fully protected.
- Stresses that environmental concerns be fully
considered in the implementation of the project.
Expanding grids will allow relief from environmentally
damaging generation facilities.
- Grid development and electricity availability
will help to increase wealth and satisfy human needs,
thus stabilizing population growth and migratory
populations.
- Calls upon the president of GENI (Global Energy
Network Institute) to bring the conclusions of this
workshop to the attention of all world leaders,
including the Secretary General of the United Nations.
MICHAEL
HESSE WOLFE
|
It will be a
strengthening force with the United
Nations definitely.
Enhancing global cooperation and interdependency
between nations and through mutual benefits
that we realize which wouldn't be possible
otherwise without the technology...
And that will create in Africa, health
systems in the villages; pilot roads
through agriculture; basic education
for children, water supply, irrigation
for crops, all these things are now
possible.
QUESTION: Do you think this will result
in the reduction of world hunger?
MHW: Yes, certainly.
*Quote
from the "WIN-WIN SOLUTION" Video.
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP
The fundamental goal of any grid system is to promote
the equitable and efficient distribution of energy.
The primary environmental objective is the optimization
of international resources, having particular regard
to sustainable development, and the use and conservation
of energy.
Potential advantages of Energy Grid interconnection:
the possibility of reducing required generating capacity
thus eliminating the most environmentally unsound
generating capacities.
There are negative environmental effects in certain
regions that are due to the lack of access to efficient
energy sources. A Global Energy Grid is capable of
diminishing these environmentally unsound consequences.
We recommend public participation; including affected
indigenous peoples, and non-governmental organizations
in the planning stages will be crucial for developing
support of the project.
Because the Grid will be subject to Global decision
making, every effort should be made to draw the attention
of intergovernmental bodies to the project. One of
the opportunities for this is the United Nations Conference
on the Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro
in 1992.
IMPLEMENTATION WORKING GROUP
We recognize that there are impediments to the implementation
of electrical projects. in each geopolitical area
of the world. In order to evaluate the degree of complexity,
and highlight the major impediments, we have created
a typical world implementation chart. The examples
are conceptual but we think illustrative.
We have assumed that the projects consist of electrical
generation and transmission that cross two or more
international boundaries. Implementation of such projects
is predicated upon political, and market support.
There are few areas in the world where major energy
projects can be implemented in the absence of broad
based public support.
In reaching our conclusions we have assumed that
the technical, economical, sociopolitical and environmental
problems are resolvable.
Overriding all other considerations is the necessity
of having the appropriate assurances that the money
would be available to fund implementation of the projects.
|
|
Major Implementation Problems
|
Time 1 Frame
|
Market 2 Need
|
Degree of 3 Complexity
|
|
Africa
Zaire-Republic of Central
Africa-Sudan-Egypt
|
- Government approval
- Security of facilities
|
2-3 years
|
5
|
3
|
|
North America
Manitoba-North Dakota-
South Dakota-Nebraska
|
- Regulatory & environmental approvals
- Acquisition of rights of way
|
5-10 years
|
1
|
5+
|
|
Asia
USSR-North Korea-
South Korea-Japan
|
- Inter-Korean politics
- Environmental
- Capital costs/financial package
|
5-10 years
|
2
|
5+
|
|
Colombia-Central America-Mexico
Colombia-Panama-Costa Rica-
Nicaragua-Honduras-El Salvador-
Guatemala-Mexico
|
|
4-5 years
|
2
|
3
|
|
Asia-North America
USSR (Siberia)-USA (Alaska)
Canada-USA
|
- Environmental
- Political/contractual
|
10-20 years
|
1
|
5+
|
|
Europe
Norway-Sweden-Finland
|
- Acquisition of rights of way
|
3-5 years
|
2
|
2
|
|
Gulf States
Oman-UAE-Saudi Arabia-
Qatar-Kuwait
|
|
2 years
|
3
|
1
|
1 Time Frame: time from the decision
by the proponent to proceed towards approval, until
construction can start.
2 Market Need: at anticipated project
completion date. 1-5, 5=highly needed
3 Degree of Complexity: 1-5, 5=highly
complex
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
We believe that the structure and participant diversity
of this workshop represent a significant even among
the many thoughtful efforts dealing with the optimum
production of energy for satisfying the ever increasing
demand for electric energy on a global basis with
minimum impact on the environment. It is hoped that
it will stimulate further discussion and detailed
studies by concerned groups around the world.
The Executive Summary has been approved on July
23, 1991 and authorized for distribution by:
|
Ali Seireg,
Principal Investigator
|
Don McGillis, Chairman Technical Working Group
|
Len Bateman, Chairman Economic Working Group
|
|
Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah,
Chairman Sociopolitical Working Group
|
Peter Dunne, Chairman Environmental Working
Group
|
Jack Cressy, Chairman Implementation Working
Group
|
Copies of this document, plus additional references
are available by contacting
GENI.
DELEGATES PARTICIPATING IN MANITOBA HVDC/GENI
WORKSHOP:
Ali Seireg - Principal Investigator, University
of Wisconsin
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
Dennis Woodford - Executive Director, Manitoba
HVDC Research Centre
Jacques Lemay - Technical Coordinator,
Hydro Quebec
Nikolai Voropai - Deputy Director, Siberian
Energy Institute
Jose Carlos Medeiros - Technical Director,
CEPEL:, Brazil
Victor Yershevich - Transmission specialist,
ENERGOPROYECT
*Don McGillis - System Planning, Hydro
Quebec. Working Group Chairman
ECONOMIC WORKING GROUP
Jack Scriven - President, Teshmont Consultants
Lars Weimer - HVDC Power Systems, Asea
Brown Boveri
Mike Tarnawecky - Electrical Engineering
Department, University of Manitoba
Alexander Malotsov - Director, Energia
Lev Belyaev - Deputy Director, Siberian
Energy Institute
Bill Perk - Community Development, Southern
Illinois University
*Len Bateman - Bateman Associates, Winnipeg.
Working Group Chairman
SOCIOPOLITICAL WORKING GROUP
Michael Hesse Wolfe - International Energy
Systems Consultant, Berkeley, California
Edward Schreyer - Resource Management,
Simon Fraser University
Ted Glass - Westinghouse Canada, Inc. retired
Yuri Sayamov - First Deputy Chairman, Commission
of Soviet Scientists
Bill Moxon - Pacific Institute of Resources
Management, New Zealand
Bob Bulmer - Strategic Planning Coordinator,
State of Alaska
*Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah - UN Office for
Development and International Economic Cooperation.
Working Group Chairman
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP
Sergei Roginko - Head of the Institute
of Europe, USSR Academy of Sciences
Joe Falcon - President-Elect ASME
Ludmila Ilyina - Institute of Geography,
USSR Academy of Sciences
Igor Slavin - Director of Science, Radioelectronics
Institute
Muriel Smith - United Nations Association,
Winnipeg
Ebraheem Alshareedah, Deputy Director,
Kuwait Institute of Scientific Research
*Peter Dunne - Former Assistant Minister
for Environment, New Zealand
IMPLEMENTATION WORKING GROUP
Jim Service - Transmission System Planning,
Ontario Hydro
Hans Stackegard - HVDC Power Systems, Asea
Brown Boveri
Will Tishinski - V.P. Facilities Planning,
Manitoba Hydro
Vladimir Kozlov - International Fuel &
Power Association, Moscow
Ismail Tag - Dean of Engineering, Qatar
University
Alexis Rivero - Technical Director, Latin
American Energy Organization
Nelson deFranco - Infrastructure Development,
World Bank
*Jack Cressy - Chairman, Monenco. Working
Group Chairman
THE NEXT STEPS
PEER REVIEW
The results of the International Workshop are
currently going through the process of being evaluated
by the industry. Comments from Workshop delegates
and invited specialists are presently being added
to the appendix.
The more extensive review is done through trade
organizations and existing think tanks and will take
several months. Targeted are IEEE,
ASME,
ADCE, CIGRE,
EPRI,
IIASA,
Edison Electric Institute, Stanford Research Institute,
Rand Corporation, World Health Organization, OTA,
USSR Academy of Sciences, Natural Resources Defense
Council, The Hunger Project, several United Nations
agencies, World Bank, Beyond Way, National Wildlife
Federation, to name just a few.
ONGOING US/USSR RESEARCH PROJECT
There were eight Soviets in Winnipeg, and several
are very interested in continuing the discussion on
linking the US and USSR across the Bering Strait.
There are plentiful hydropower and two large tidal
sites in Siberia and Alaska which can be developed
delivering abundant and cheap electricity to
Japan, Korea, and China. This would also make the
production of liquid hydrogen economically feasible.
The Alaskan delegate who works in Governor Hickel's
office suggested a roundtable meeting of those especially
interested in this proposal. GENI and GENI Alaska
could be the catalyst and coordinator for this exchange
doable by the end of the year. This would be
the opportunity to get the two superpowers face-to-face,
working on a mutually beneficial project... good for
both, economically and environmentally
VIDEO DOCUMENTARY
A one hour video documentary needs to be created
for mass appeal ultimately to be shown around
the world. Targeted networks are CNN, KPBS, Beyond
2000, the Discovery Channel and similar programs in
all countries. Versions will be needed in English,
Russian, French, German, Chinese, Japanese, Hindi,
Arabic, and Spanish. We have 18 specialists on video
tape from the International Workshop who give expert
corroboration to the GENI story. We now have two outstanding
videos (both 15 minutes) that could be the cornerstone
for a full length feature. Funding and sponsors are
needed for the intended completion date of December
31, 1991.
GLOBAL 5000
The world's leaders -- 5000 decision makers are
set to receive the GENI findings. These people included
the United Nations representatives, Secretaries of
State and Foreign Ministers, global educators, Fortune
1000 businesses and key world media. These people
will form the nucleus for informing all people of
the benefits of GENI. The time frame for contact is
January/February 1992.
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT
Thousands of delegates from 166 nations will gather
in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in June 1992 to set the
environment/development agenda for the coming decade.
GENI aims to be at the top of the agenda we're
striving for a resolution signed by all countries
stating now is the time to work cooperatively on linking
international and inter-regional electric energy networks
on all continents.
Request:
Request a GENI Video
Discuss this proposal and share the GENI video
with friends and business associates. (Use the Tell
your friends about this page feature below)
Write
a letter to your political leaders, especially
the Presidents of the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. and the
U.N. Secretary General
Contact
your local media regarding a feature story
on GENI
Arrange
a presentation for GENI at your group's luncheon
or trade conference
Contribute
money or skills to forward the education of this
global opportunity
GENI Support
and Products
- GENI
Video:
What if... a new global option
This 15 minute video has been seen
around the world. Designed for the general public,
it's the best overview of the GENI Initiative. Introduction
by John Denver.
- GENI T-shirts (no longer offered)
"Connect the World with GENI"
three color shirt along with Dymaxion
Map in blue and yellow, Grid and print in red.
- GENI
Brochures
A concise statement on GENI, as well as the benefits
in the areas of economics, the environment, international
trade and cooperation, hunger and overpopulation.
This piece will explain GENI to your firends in
3 minutes.
- GENI
Source Document and Placement on the GENI
Mailing List
You'll receive documentation and
support literature on the Global Energy Grid proposal,
priority mailing of hardcopy GENI Newsletters, and
monthly e-mail updates on the status of this discussion
around the world.
Dymaxion
Globe
Folded from the Dymaxion Map,
this four-color 6" globe generates conversation
on global issues and solutions.
- New
GENI Video:
A WIN-WIN Solution
A 15 minute discussion by ten delegates
who participated in the International Workshop in
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada in July 1991. The consensus
statement strongly corroborated the GENI initiative
as very credible. It's a win-win
proposal for everyone involved. Joe Falson
- Working
Group Reports, Maps, Graphs, and Appendix of International
Workshop
Complete set of documents from the
36 delegates who met in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
July 1991. $50 donation.
|
Beautiful four color poster
printed on heavy-gauge paper.
Promises to generate discussions in your
home and office.
|
Two decades
ago, the late R. Buckminster Fuller
proposed interconnecting regional power
systems into a single continuous global electrical
energy grid. • While this vision is still years
away, tech-
nological advances have made the linking of
international and
inter regional energy networks practicable today.
• Transmission
lines allow utilities to level the peaks and
valleys of demand. This is
accomplished between East-West time zones, as
well as North-South
seasonal variations in demand. • The origin
of the energy grid initiative
emerged as the highest priority of the World
Game™. Its stated purpose
is “to make the world work for 100% of humanity
in the shortest possible
time through spontaneous cooperation without
ecological damage or the
disadvantage of anyone.” Research reveals that
these major benefits will
result from expanding electrical networks. •
Increase in everyone’s stan-
dard of living • Reduction of fossil fuel demand
and the resultant pollu-
tion • Relief of the population explosion •
Reduction of world hunger
• Enhancement of world trade • Promotion of
international
cooperation and peace • The purpose of GENI,
Global
Energy Network Institute, is to educate all
people,
especially world leaders, to the potential
benefits of this win-win
solution. •
|
|
The Doctrines which
dominated military thought and planning throughout
the decades following WWII have suddenly lost
their relevance and applicability. Appropriate
security structures need to be found to replace
the adversarial strategies of the past.
UN Secretary- General Javier
Perez de Cuellar
|
|